Friday, February 24, 2006

The Perversion of Religion

The marriage of right-wing Christians with republican neo-cons is one of the most perverted uses of religion in my lifetime. When right-wing politicians and power hungry Christians join forces to lie, start unnecessary wars and kill thousands of innocent civilians then the end is not far off. This is a perversion of religion and will stain America for decades to come. When will America wake up to the lies of these evil leaders and put someone in office who actually represents the real spirit of Christ and justice of God? Our present leaders mock Christ and cause God to turn her head away in shame with their actions.

Thursday, February 23, 2006

Trojan Horse

The bush administration came in as a trojan horse. They claimed to be moderate and once in office the truth came out about their right-wing neo-con polices. Our country has suffered ever since.

Go

How far will bush supporters go to accomodate and make excuses for "w" and his killer administration? They are just shameless appologists with no principles. I don't expect any more from them. They can't help it.

Civil

Now we have Civil War in Iraq between the Shiites and Sunnies. Mission Accomplished!

You're doin a heck of a job bushy!

Why?

Why do right-wing neo-con men continue to try and defend the indefensible policies of this pathetic administration? What a useless waste of time.

Monday, February 20, 2006

Striking

It's striking, isn't it? American conservatives are so like the radical Muslims taking to the streets this week. Both claim moral superiority based on religion. Both use the language of hatred as political speech. Both advocate violence against those with whom they disagree. And they both despise the concept of a free press.
Lest we forget, here are a few choice quotes to remind the Bill Bennetts of this world just what they and their friends really stand for:
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." Ann Coulter
"And if Al-Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it ... You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead." Bill O'Reilly
"I have to say I'm all for public flogging." Ann Coulter
"(On torture at Abu Ghraib): I'm talking about people having a good time, these people, you ever heard of emotional release? You [ever] heard of need to blow some steam off?" Rush Limbaugh
"If [Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez] thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it." Pat Robertson
"(on the kidnapping of peace activists in Iraq): "I'm telling you, folks, there's a part of me that likes this." Rush Limbaugh
"I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore, and I'm wondering if I could kill him myself." Glenn Beck
"It would be a much better country if women did not vote." Ann Coulter
"[Y]ou could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down." Bill Bennett
President Bush said of the Muslim cartoon riots, ""We reject violence as a way to express discontent with what may be printed in a free press." If he means it, he can finally call Ann Coulter to task for saying "my only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
Until then, let all these fanatics (and the politicians like Cheney who appear on their programs) be branded as the hypocrites they are. Muslim extremists and American conservatives: They're soul mates.

Friday, February 10, 2006

?

Isn't it striking? American conservatives are so like the radical Muslims taking to the streets this week. Both claim moral superiority based on religion. Both use the language of hatred as political speech. Both advocate violence against those with whom they disagree. And they both despise the concept of free will and a free press.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Calling

Calling any and all reasonable conservatives; There once was a time when being conservative meant you could have an intellectual debate over many issues with those of different opinion, without resorting to calling them unpatriotic and ungodly cretins. Those were the days when being Republican meant you were a true conservative fiscally, internationally, socially and intellectually. These true conservatives didn’t claim to believe in limited government and then grow the size of government and the deficit three fold. These conservatives strongly held to the Constitutional fundamentals of separation of Church and State, Balance of Powers and rule of law. These conservatives didn’t reject modern science for ignorance. These conservatives didn’t claim to speak for God and then lie their way into needless war. These conservatives didn’t say they were compassionate and then decimate governmental help to those in need. These conservatives weren’t corrupt beaurocrats conspiring to take bribes from the highest bidder in order to line their pockets. These conservatives weren’t racist bigots and homophobes who endorsed discrimination or claimed to be pro-life but yet had no problem killing over a hundred thousand innocent civilians in a war of choice. These conservatives didn’t claim to believe in a democracy and then support a kingdom of the executive. We are not a monarchy. We are a Republic. Where are the true conservatives? Today’s republican neocons are anything but conservative. They have betrayed all that conservatism has stood for throughout history. I would love to debate a real conservative instead of the faux conservatives who hide behind the demagogue of blow hard talk show hosts, right-wing think tanks and one sided media con-men. I have attempted to find a local conservative in whom I can have a reasonable discussion with but they apparently don’t exist in this area. All I seem to be able to find is angry, bigoted and hate filled loud mouth white guys with a singular agenda of lies and attacks on anyone who disagrees with them. They want to force their views on all Americans, period. Not what I would call a true intellectually honest American patriot.

Friday, February 03, 2006

Neo-Con Man

Well I had another CONVERSATION with the local neo-con wack job the other day and he responded that, "collateral damage means unintentional killing." It's still killing thousands of innocent women, children and pregnant women. Saying its collateral damage does not bring them back to life. He finally opened a dictionary and thinks he has a way to escape the folly of his belief that it's acceptable for a real Christian to believe the death of civilians in war is OK. By his flawed stream of logic the lives of these innocents are just part of the process of war and their lives don't matter anyway. After all they are just those Arabs in the evil empire of Iraq. What he neglected to mention was that this was a war of choice. A war that bush knew had no justification so he lied repeatedly and continues to lie to the world in order to get the war he and his neo-con killers had always wanted. This war was unneccessary and not justified. Iraq had no part in 911 and did nothing to the U.S. For faux Christians to claim otherwise is just "Intentional Sin" and the worst kind of hypocritical justification for killing. For a group who claims to be pro-life they have an odd way of showing it. They are Republicans first and Jesus followers second. Just call them "convenient christians." They pretend to follow Jesus teachings when it's convenient to them or when they need to dupe a lot of gullible citizens into believing their political party needs to be elected. Wo to those who claim the name of Christ but follow the path of the evil one.